Skip to main content
Geopolitics & DefenseGovernment & Policy

Congressman Targets Trump's Silicon Valley Startup Deals

US Capitol Building hearing room with empty chair and laptop, softly lit with tall windows.

“I’m starting to talk to my colleagues about a comprehensive and robust agenda to rebuild the capacity of the federal government, an American capacity agenda, for lack of a better term,” Rep. James Walkinshaw said in a recent interview, laying out a three‑pillar plan aimed at restoring lost personnel, tightening cybersecurity and reshaping how agencies buy and use modern technology.

Rep. James Walkinshaw’s three‑pillar agenda: talent, technology, delivery

Walkinshaw, a Democrat from Virginia, framed his priorities around rebuilding what he described as a “battered federal workforce,” accelerating secure AI and technology modernization, and shifting agency incentives so success is measured by service delivery rather than checklist compliance. He tied that agenda to the personnel disruptions he attributes to the Department of Government Efficiency, saying the federal enterprise lost “300,000 federal workers” and that many of those departures were staff experienced in agency technology and operations.

Contractor oversight and the White House ballroom donors

The congressman pledged “heavy scrutiny of the contracting practices” of the current administration if Democrats regain the House this fall. He specifically named contracts with the Defense and Homeland Security departments as within that purview and drew attention to contractors who donated to the White House ballroom renovation and other projects pursued under the current White House.

Walkinshaw warned that companies that “played by the Trump rules … those companies and the contracts they received are going to face a lot of scrutiny,” while those that followed existing rules will be vindicated. He also criticized what he called a Trump‑era “fetishization” of Silicon Valley startups in defense procurement, arguing that startup culture cannot substitute for sustained oversight, procurement standards, and long‑term IT management.

Cybersecurity: CISA staffing, shadow IT, and event logging

Walkinshaw flagged cybersecurity as a testing ground for his agenda. He said the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has been “significantly cut over the past year” and pointed to recent public hiring targets: CISA’s acting director Nick Andersen said the agency intends to hire around 330 people in the coming months, while Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said the cyber unit likely needs about 600 hires and that recruiting could take a year.

But the congressman warned restaffing “is a very difficult thing to do after you’ve just attacked people, abused them, denigrated their service.” He said he will press appropriations amendments to address basic cyber “blocking and tackling” and to confront shadow IT—tech and AI tools used without management approval. Walkinshaw is also focusing on event logging: he plans amendments to force agencies to comply with logging requirements and, with Rep. Don Bacon, R‑Neb., introduced legislation on June 25 requiring the Department of Homeland Security to report identified gaps that prevent full compliance with event logging rules.

FITARA scorecard and FedRAMP modernization

Walkinshaw wants to revive two oversight tools he views as essential. He called for reinstating the biannual FITARA scorecard—created in collaboration with the Government Accountability Office and first released in November 2015—to pressure agencies on modernization. The most recent scorecard was released in September 2024; Walkinshaw said current Republican committee leadership “has kind of walked away” from the scorecard, in part to avoid subpoena fights.

He also outlined priorities for FedRAMP, noting the program will need reauthorization next year and that GSA is rolling out a FedRAMP 20x initiative. Walkinshaw described continued FedRAMP authority as “100% necessary” and expressed concern about its funding, which comes from GSA’s Federal Citizen Services Fund and therefore lacks stable statutory backing. He wants clearer statutory requirements for the FedRAMP office to engage industry and the public, and to address the gap where agencies still require a separate authority to operate (ATO) after FedRAMP authorization—sometimes leading providers to repeat work they already completed.

AI legislation timing and possible export‑control provisions

On AI regulation, Walkinshaw said a large national AI package is unlikely before the election and forecast action “early next year.” He noted that Reps. Jay Obernolte, R‑Calif., and Lori Trahan, D‑N.Y., released a discussion draft earlier in June that would, among other things, preempt state AI laws—but Walkinshaw said both parties are largely in a wait‑and‑see posture. He suggested export controls on AI products could be a feature of future legislation, pointing to the federal decision to restrict the release of certain Anthropic products as a recent precedent that raises questions about how to provide industry certainty while ensuring safety for advanced models.

What this means for technologists, policymakers, and defense contractors

  • Technologists and security teams: Expect renewed emphasis on event logging, blocking and tackling cyber hygiene, and tighter controls on shadow IT if Walkinshaw’s appropriations amendments succeed.
  • Policymakers and oversight committees: Reviving the FITARA scorecard and pressing for statutory changes to FedRAMP would reintroduce public grading and a stronger statutory framework for cloud authorization and engagement with industry.
  • Defense and Homeland contractors: Companies tied to recent White House projects should anticipate scrutiny of contracting practices; startups courting national‑security work may face increased demands for procurement safeguards and long‑term operational plans rather than rapid one‑off deployments.

Walkinshaw’s agenda ties hiring and workforce rebuilding to procurement reform and tighter cyber controls, setting clear targets—FITARA revival, FedRAMP reauthorization, event‑logging reporting, and appropriation amendments—that can be tracked over the coming months. The critical tests will be whether Congress takes up those measures after the midterms and whether agencies can recruit and retain enough skilled staff to reverse recent cuts while meeting new oversight demands.

Original reporting: Defense One