"The Secret Bunker is now privately owned by the Siebert family and is run as a museum trust," the TWZ post reads.
RAF Hack Green: chosen for RADAR and a six-decade defensive role
The caption attached to the Bunker Talk open thread places RAF Hack Green at the center of a long arc of British defense planning. According to the post, Hack Green "played a central role in the defence of Britain for almost sixty years," having been chosen during World War II "to protect the land between Birmingham and Liverpool" and selected as a location "for the new RADAR equipment." The site later served "for shelter and protection during the Cold War," and—per the same account—was sold off "as relations between East and West thawed."
The BBC broadcasting studio inside the former bunker
The TWZ caption includes a dated visual reference: "NANTWICH, ENGLAND – MAY 24: The BBC broadcasting studio inside the former RAF Hack Green secret nuclear bunker on May 24, 2023 in Nantwich, England." The photograph credited is by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images. The detail highlights how the bunker’s internal spaces have been repurposed, with a BBC broadcasting studio situated within a structure originally designed for wartime and Cold War contingencies.

Audit-ready is a season. It shouldn't be.
Evidence in spreadsheets, controls drifting between audits, frameworks multiplying on flat headcount. Nubivance runs continuous compliance on Rapid7 Cyber GRC - SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI, CMMC.
End the scrambleThe Siebert family and the Secret Bunker museum trust
The post explicitly identifies the current custodian: the site is "now privately owned by the Siebert family and is run as a museum trust." That ownership and governance model—private ownership combined with operation as a museum trust—is the operational fact conveyed by the TWZ item and is the mechanism by which Hack Green’s physical legacy is being preserved and presented to visitors and the public.
Bunker Talk prime directives: rules for the open thread
Alongside the historical caption, the Bunker Talk post lays out a set of behavioural guidelines labeled as "PRIME DIRECTIVES." The rules are emphatic and specific: political discussion is permitted but must be respectful; users are told "If you have political differences, hash it out respectfully, stick to the facts, and no childish name-calling or personal attacks of any kind." The directives forbid "drive-by garbage political memes" and "conspiracy theory rants," warn that "Links to crackpot sites will be axed," and state that "Trolling and shitposting will not be tolerated."
The guidance further discourages "obsessive behavior about other users" and urges use of the mute button for content a member does not like. Finally, the post asks readers to "report offenders" but clarifies: "This doesn’t mean reporting people who don’t share your political views."
What this means for museum visitors, the Nantwich community, and forum contributors
- Museum visitors: The site they will encounter is described as a former RAF installation repurposed into a museum trust under private ownership by the Siebert family, with spaces such as a BBC broadcasting studio present inside the former bunker.
- The Nantwich community: The post locates the site in Nantwich, England, and notes the bunker’s historical role protecting the land "between Birmingham and Liverpool," linking local geography to the structure’s wartime and Cold War purposes.
- Forum contributors: Participants in the Bunker Talk open thread are given a clear code of conduct—the PRIME DIRECTIVES—that prescribes respectful debate, bans certain classes of content (memes, conspiracy rants, and "crackpot" links), and asks users to report rule-breakers while avoiding frivolous or ideologically motivated reports.
Together, the caption and the thread’s directives present two distinct forms of stewardship: one custodial, physical and local—the Siebert family running the Secret Bunker as a museum trust—and the other communal and procedural—the Bunker Talk community enforcing norms to preserve a civil space for discussion. Both are concrete facts in the TWZ post: a site once selected for RADAR and wartime defence now serves museum and broadcasting functions, and the forum that highlights it sets explicit ground rules for how members should interact.
Read the original post on TWZ: https://www.twz.com/news-features/bunker-talk-lets-talk-about-all-the-things-we-did-and-didnt-cover-this-week-209




