Who is responsible for the network perimeter when the perimeter no longer exists? That is the practical dilemma at the heart of a webinar promo that promises “a practical look at securing identities, devices and applications wherever work happens.”
The new perimeter: diffuse and distributed
The shift to hybrid work has reshaped the enterprise perimeter, the source notes. Users are no longer concentrated behind corporate firewalls; they are logging in from home networks, shared spaces and unmanaged devices. At the same time, applications that once lived on-premises now span on-prem systems and multiple clouds. That combination, the promo argues, produces a level of fragmentation traditional security models were not designed to handle.
Current state: visibility and control under strain
According to the webinar promo, many organizations are struggling to maintain visibility and control in this environment without adding friction. The move to hybrid work amplifies complexity across identities, devices and applications, creating gaps between where work happens and where security tools were built to operate.
Why it matters: risk, usability and organizational strain
- Risk expands when identities, devices and applications are dispersed across home networks, shared spaces and unmanaged endpoints; centralized, perimeter-based defenses become less effective as a single point of security.
- Efforts to recover visibility and control can introduce friction for users, the promo warns — a tradeoff that organizations find difficult to manage while keeping work productive.
- Applications that live across on-prem systems and multiple clouds complicate policy enforcement and monitoring, increasing the operational burden on security and IT teams.
What the webinar promises and the analysis it implies
The promotional material frames the webinar as a “practical look” at how to secure identities, devices and applications wherever work happens. That positioning implies a focus on approaches and tools that can operate across fragmented networks and hybrid application estates while minimizing user friction. It also underscores a core tension: organizations need stronger visibility and control, yet must avoid measures that disrupt how people actually work.
This tension shapes the perspectives of stakeholders differently. Technologists and security teams are confronted with architectural and operational questions about where and how to place controls. Organizational leaders must weigh security improvements against user productivity and experience. Users expect seamless access from varied environments. And the shifting perimeter forces all parties to reconcile legacy security assumptions with the realities of distributed work.
Conclusion: a practical question with no simple perimeter
The webinar promo delivers a succinct diagnosis: hybrid work has dissolved the old perimeter, applications live in more places, and many organizations lack the visibility and control needed to manage that reality without impeding users. The practical question that follows is clear: how do organizations secure identities, devices and applications in a world where work happens everywhere — without turning security into an obstacle to the very work it is meant to protect?
https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2026/04/03/hybrid_work_expanded_risk/
